nashof
Mechanical
- Sep 17, 2008
- 27
Hello All,
I have two doubts regarding cyclic service / fatigue analysis thay I can't understand, and I'd be very pleased if you could give me a hand:
1- The vessel (horizontal drum, thickness 1/2")has temperature cyclic service. The vessel is at ambient temperature (20ºC = 68ºF), and when the cold fluid gets into it the temperature goes down to -170ºC (-274ºF). This us supposed to happen 500 times during vessel life.
My doubt checking ASME VIII Div.2 - AD.160 is about the "F" number that I have to chose. This number is related with the range of temperature change, and you have to multiply it by the number of cyclics, if the result is more than 1000 it means a fatigue analysis is required.
But, for the situation I have told do I need to consider temperature variation of 190ºC (342ºF)??? This would result a factor of eight (8), so the efective numer of cyclics would be 500x8=4000.
The code talks about difference in wall temperature in meridional and radial direction, but I can't understadn it perfectly.
2) I am talting about AD-160, so you can see I'm with Ed.2004 of Div.2.
I'm asking about this becasue I think new (Ed.2007) of Div.2 is not compulsory at this moment.
But, if the vessel will be designed according Div.1, for which Ed.2007 is compulsory yet, and the fatigue analysis if required should be performed following Div.2, do you think we should use Div.2 Ed. 2007 for this purpose??
Thank you very much!!!
I have two doubts regarding cyclic service / fatigue analysis thay I can't understand, and I'd be very pleased if you could give me a hand:
1- The vessel (horizontal drum, thickness 1/2")has temperature cyclic service. The vessel is at ambient temperature (20ºC = 68ºF), and when the cold fluid gets into it the temperature goes down to -170ºC (-274ºF). This us supposed to happen 500 times during vessel life.
My doubt checking ASME VIII Div.2 - AD.160 is about the "F" number that I have to chose. This number is related with the range of temperature change, and you have to multiply it by the number of cyclics, if the result is more than 1000 it means a fatigue analysis is required.
But, for the situation I have told do I need to consider temperature variation of 190ºC (342ºF)??? This would result a factor of eight (8), so the efective numer of cyclics would be 500x8=4000.
The code talks about difference in wall temperature in meridional and radial direction, but I can't understadn it perfectly.
2) I am talting about AD-160, so you can see I'm with Ed.2004 of Div.2.
I'm asking about this becasue I think new (Ed.2007) of Div.2 is not compulsory at this moment.
But, if the vessel will be designed according Div.1, for which Ed.2007 is compulsory yet, and the fatigue analysis if required should be performed following Div.2, do you think we should use Div.2 Ed. 2007 for this purpose??
Thank you very much!!!