The ethylene (published) uncatalysed decomposition temperature is 730
oC, quite high. And the activation energy for this decomposition is 195 kJ/mol.
There is an index known as RHI (Reaction Hazard Index)
= 10 T
d/(T
d+30*E
a)
where T
d is the decomposition temperature (K) and E
a is the activation energy in kcal/mole. Relatively low reactivities are in the range 1-3, 5-8 values are considered high reactivities. The RHI for ethylene is 4.19, an intermediate value.
I've also read that ethylene pipelines should be as short as possible, and sometimes buried 3-5 m below ground level to keep a temperature of around 20
oC, just above the critical temperature of 9.9
oC, so it can be
pumped at pressures of 50-55 bar, as a very dense gas.... nearly as dense as a liquid, but still a gas.
I heard of one ethylene explosion with two fatalities, many people injured and heavy property damage as a result of a leak in a compression fitting in a high pressure (1000-2500 psi) line in a pipe trench releasing a cloud of 200 to 500 lb ethylene, that ignited resulting in an explosion equivalent to 0.12-0.30 ton of TNT.
A release of 500 lb ethylene is equivalent to 8100 moles. The combustion of ethylene releases some 314,000 cal/mole. Thus, the energy released would be 314,000*8100 = 2.54*10
9 cal.
An explosion energy equivalent to 0.3 ton TNT is about 3*10
8 cal, that is a 12% fraction of the combustion energy, rather high in comparison with the 2% attributed to unconfined vapour cloud explosions. This is, apparently, a result of the explosion taking place in a partially confined area.
Probable causes for such an event were attributed to:
(a) the use of nonwelded pipe; (b) the lack of instrumentation to detect/analyse vapours and provide alarms; (c) the installation of pipe in trenches where ignitable clouds can form as a result of vapour accumulation.
Other ethylene explosions I heard of were connected to breakage of a drain fitting from a high pressure compressor. Another case was the result of compressor vibration causing transverse fatigue on a 1/8-in stainless steel tubing, leading to a gage, that failed.
Trevor Kletz,
Learning from Accidents in Industry Butterworth, 1988, and Walter B. Howard, "Process Safety Technology and the Resposibilities of Industry" CEP, Sept. 1988, are good reading.