StructuralAddict
Civil/Environmental
- Jul 19, 2016
- 106
Hi All,
I am modeling a sample project to understand how ETABS reduces the live load automatically.
I modeled the 10-storey building shown in the attached file by defining the live load pattern one time as (Live) and the other time as (Reducible Live) from "Define --> Load Patterns..."
I also chose the Canadian Building Code (NBCC2010) from "Design --> Live Load Reduction Factors... --> Tributary Area (Based on Design Code)".
I assumed that the live load on the slabs is 2.873 kPa and the span between each two adjacent columns is 6.0 m. Dead load is not considered in the analysis (Self-weight multiplier = 0).
Surprisingly, the results for both cases (live and reducible live) are the same! This means that ETABS did not reduce the live load as it should do.
Can anyone please help me with this issue? What should I do to let ETABS consider the live load reduction?
Thanks in advance!
Monir
I am modeling a sample project to understand how ETABS reduces the live load automatically.
I modeled the 10-storey building shown in the attached file by defining the live load pattern one time as (Live) and the other time as (Reducible Live) from "Define --> Load Patterns..."
I also chose the Canadian Building Code (NBCC2010) from "Design --> Live Load Reduction Factors... --> Tributary Area (Based on Design Code)".
I assumed that the live load on the slabs is 2.873 kPa and the span between each two adjacent columns is 6.0 m. Dead load is not considered in the analysis (Self-weight multiplier = 0).
Surprisingly, the results for both cases (live and reducible live) are the same! This means that ETABS did not reduce the live load as it should do.
Can anyone please help me with this issue? What should I do to let ETABS consider the live load reduction?
Thanks in advance!
Monir