Josep Maria Perdigo
Mechanical
In EN 13445-3: 2014 tables 17-2 and 17.3 are missing. I think this is an editing erratum. I will continue to use the tables of EN 13445-3: 2009.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
EN 13445-3, 17: Simplified fatigue assesment
- Thread starter Josep Maria Perdigo
- Start date
- Status
MGZmechanical
Mechanical
True at least in the spanish version. I think they should be the same,
- Thread starter
- #4
Josep Maria Perdigo
Mechanical
I am referring to the Spanish version:
- 17.6.2.3, second paragraph, mentions Table 17-3.
- Table 17-2, it is certainly not mentioned, and although the factors C1 and C2 are no longer necessary, but the values Δσ and Δσcut are still necessary to use the formulas of 17.6.6.
In addition, in 17.6.6.2 there is an erratum that persists since the 2009 version. It says: Δσcut <= Δσ* > Δσ
It should read: Δσcut <= Δσ* <= Δσ
- 17.6.2.3, second paragraph, mentions Table 17-3.
- Table 17-2, it is certainly not mentioned, and although the factors C1 and C2 are no longer necessary, but the values Δσ and Δσcut are still necessary to use the formulas of 17.6.6.
In addition, in 17.6.6.2 there is an erratum that persists since the 2009 version. It says: Δσcut <= Δσ* > Δσ
It should read: Δσcut <= Δσ* <= Δσ
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Question
- Question
