I'm with JAE, you do not put contraction joints in elevated slabs. If you put them in you need to check the slab for the bending/shear at the reduced section depth.
In the picture shown, there certainly should be not contraction joints. But I think is is an overgeneralization to say never. What a lot of people call expansion joints are really for contraction.
If you have a one way elevated slab, would there be any issues with contraction joints parallel to the slab span? Seems like it would be beneficial if the slab has an exposed finish?
A joint parallel to the span could be considered, but you might want to explain further how this is beneficial to the finish. You have to assess what effect a joint has on the overall structural stability of the building.
The joint would minimize random shrinkage cracking in the slab, maintaining a cleaner appearance. The ones we have specified would allow horizontal movement but not vertical. And yes that's a good point, the use of the diaphragm would have to work around the joints.