csd72
In the USA, I would not have to prove anything. The burden of proof is always on the accuser. You say I sealed something? Prove it. If you can't prove I sealed it, I have no liability. The only thing I have to do is truthfully answer your questions while under oath: "Steve, did you seal this drawing (holds up a plan Steve did not seal)?" "No, ma'am, I did not." "Thank you, nothing further for this witness." Pretty short trial, don't you think?
In the USA, I would not have to prosecute anyone. The person who wrongly accused me of sealing something which he/she could not prove I sealed - after paying my legal fees, and anything my lawyer could wring out of him/her for slander, defamation of character, etc - would have to do that, if they had any $$ left to do it. The only thing I have to do is truthfully answer your questions while under oath: "Steve, do you know who forged this drawing (holds up a plan Steve did not seal)?" "No, ma'am, I do not, but my analysis of the companies network routings shows beyond any doubt it was plotted by (blank) at precisely (this time on this day, from this computer, to this plotter)." "Thank you, nothing further for this witness. I now call (blank), the person too ignorant of modern technology to not plot a forged document." Another pretty short trial, I would imagine.
In the USA, if there was no signature on the drawings, then they are not sealed or forged or valid, so that scenario doesn't apply to the OP.
Again (to both points), US law, as I recall from history classes, is largely based on English law, so I have to assume the situation is the same in UK.
Again (to both points), US law, as I recall from history classes, is largely based on English law, so I have to assume the situation is the same in UK.
Signature under construction, sorry about the mess - Steve