aolalde said:
Option 1.- Apply an induction motor 6600 HP, 6600 rpm, 4160V, whatever high frequency to match the speed / poles , DIRECT COUPLED to the compressor.
Option 2.- Apply a synchronous motor 6000 HP, 1200 rpm, 4160 V COUPLED TO A GEAR BOX Ratio 1/5.5 and then coupled to the compressor.
In both cases the load torque is: T = 5250 *6000 / 6600 = 4773 Lb-Ft
Why is that anything different than what I said?
The motor itself would not need to be custom designed, but the mistake I see that I made was in not looking up any MV motors before I posted, because I was thinking about the VFD. I ASSumed that they didn't make dual voltage motors at 6000HP 4000V, but they do (duh, they just connect it in Wye to get the lower voltage rating). So the solution would be what I said in the middle paragraph of my earlier post. Use a dual voltage (2300/4000V) motor, and connect to the 2300V winding pattern so that at 110Hz, you can be at 4160V and will not have lost any appreciable torque at that speed (37.8 V/Hz vs 38.2 V/Hz).
The VFD will still need to handle the additional current however, so it will look more like a 10,000HP 4160V VFD (approx. 1440A), regardless of what the "custom" label says on the outside.
So to ammend my earlier statement, assuming the motor design efficiency is close to the same (no way of knowing really)[ol A]
[li]If you use a 10,000HP equivalent VFD to do this job with a 6600RPM induction motor, and will lose about 3% in VFD efficiency, the losses will be about 22kW.[/li][li]If you use a 6000HP VFD on a 1200RPM Synch motor, the losses will be about 13kW in the VFD, plus about 179kW though the gearbox, for a total of 192kW[/li][/ol]
Induction motor is much more efficient of those choices.
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at faq731-376
![[pirate] [pirate] [pirate]](/data/assets/smilies/pirate.gif)
Member, [blue]P
3[/blue]