I'm the kind of guy that Ron recommends you talk to. I wear various hats, but one of them is Quality Assurance Manager for a ready mix producer. Ron is correct, there are just too many variables in play to calculate early age strength. And, the earlier the strength requirement is, the more volatility those variables impart to strength test results. A change in a variable that may have negligible effect on 28-day results may have an enormous effect on short term results, such as 24 hour, or 3 days results, much less so for 7 day results.
That being said, shobroco is also correct. Given a specification requirement for a certain high-early concrete, I can almost always come up with a design that will meet the requirement. However, the more difficult the requirement, the more intense the effort to control the variables must be, and the more you are going to pay for it. Often disputes occur, because I don't control all the variables and therefore can't be held responsible when somebody else doesn't do their part.
In my opinion, it is better to use maturity meters to determine the strength of in place concrete when the construction schedule is dependent on achieving a certain concrete strength before the next step can be taken. This takes most of the variables out of play and allows you to know more precisely when the concrete has sufficiently cured for the next construction phase.