Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DOF Springs???

Status
Not open for further replies.

legersalazar

Aerospace
Dec 1, 2009
57
Hello Forum,

I've been reading about modeling fasteners on the web and all sources suggest to use "spring/damper" elements (CBUSH) in lieu of DOF Springs.

My question to you is:

What are "DOF springs" used for???

Thank you,

Whyowhyowhy
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

providing a elastic connection between pieces, like rivets.
 
@rb1957

Aren't "Spring/Damper" elements (CBUSH) preferred for any type of fasteners (including rivets)?
 
CBUSH = dof spring ... CBUSH is the NASTRAN element (used to be CELAS), "dof spring" is FeMap modelling
 
I'm working with FEMAP Version 10.2.1A (preprocessor) and NX Nastran (solver) and it's telling me that my "DOF Springs" are CELAS, not CBUSH.
 
does it matter ? if the data input for your dof spring is a single stiffness in a specific direction, then it's a CELAS. if the input is more generalised (mulitple stiffnesses, rotational stiffness, damping, ...) then that sounds like a CBUSH. looking at the f06 or your user manual should tell you the specific element used in analysis.

looking at the data entry i have (FeMap 10.3), "dof spring" has a single stiffness (= CELAS) and "spring/damper" multiple (= CBUSH).

look at the f06 to be sure.
 
I've noticed a difference in results obtained when using a CBUSH element vs using multiple CELAS elements to simulate a fastener with tension/shear capabilities.

Why and how is this different?

Thank you,

Whyowhy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor