Well, I'll go out and say the answer to your query is a "definite maybe." Not the response you are looking for but realistic.
Most vessel baseplates / chairs / anchor bolts are not designed to be pretensioned. In this case, "snug" is the operative term. But a very few vessels, typically of the large variety and in heavy wind or seismic areas, are designed with pretensioned anchor bolts. These add a couple bolts (half the bolts plus 2 usually) acting in tension to counter the overturning moment.
My thoughts on the matter: It is difficult enough to get pressure containing flanged joints tensioned properly. To have 49 vessels in a facility with no torque requirements and 1 "special" is asking for the pretensioning to not occur, or to not be maintained. So I'm generally opposed to the notion but open to a one-off argument for a particular case if somebody were to bring one up for my review.
The ASME Post Construction Committee has had a long-term effort to write an article for PCC-2 which would include this issue. It's been stalled out for years primarily because of the pretensioned anchor bolt issue. The possibility exists that the article might make it into the 2018 edition, but I won't be expecting it to happen.