I would like to thank everyone for their contribution to this problem and answer the questions. Irstuff, after hardening, the shaft has an excessive bow in it, app .500” run out, the shafts are straightened to .090” after hardening. We are heating with induction, we start with a low heat level, then apply more heat as we start to scan. Metengr, we tend to run at the lowest frequency possible that will produce the effective case depth without heating too deep. Metman, we are straightening the shafts immediately after hardening, if the shafts have excessive run out, we temper them at 350 F, then straighten hot out of the temper. Ibf, we are using a single turn coil on this shaft, the pattern run out at the end of the shaft does not allow us to use a two turn on this part. Carburize, we have not tried the normalized shafts yet, keep reading. EdDanzer, we are supporting the shaft between centers, and yes the shafts grow app. .100” in length during hardening. We use a very weak spring loaded top center to allow for the expansion. Late yesterday, we started running the same shaft, but from a different heat, the shafts have very little distortion. The problem appears to be related to this one heat of material. The two chemistries are almost identical. We have two more heats of this material to harden, if they harden without the distortion, we will contact the mill. I will post the results on the shafts that were normalized. Thanks again for the help.