Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

DIN 931 vs. DIN 933

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nordern

Mechanical
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
11
Location
US
In trying to minimize our fastener inventory is it possible , without knowing any particular useage, to eliminate a DIN 931 (partial thread) and replace it with
a DIN 933 (fully threaded) in all instances.
 
I can't think of a reason why you couldn't replace a DIN 931 fastener with an equivalent length DIN 933 fastener.
 
Nordern,

I have had applications where I was required to use fasteners with unthreaded shanks. Typically, I was required to use specific fasteners with unthreaded shanks such as AN series bolts, and there were all sorts of requirements about the joint design. DIN931 would not have done.

Is anyone insisting that you use DIN931?

Critter.gif
JHG
 
Drawoh,

No real insistance on the 931 vs. 933 only thing is that at around 2" (50mm) the 931 seems to be used more. Do you believe with a longer bolt an uthreaded section will "stretch" better w/o the chance of failure?
 
Nordern,

I have no idea of how your bolted joints work. If your nuts come loose, the unthreaded shanks require more force to shear. This matters on some applications.

Critter.gif
JHG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top