Wow, lot of stuff there. Yeah, I'm not worried about # of instances of a hole. rgrayclamps, I get the same End Condition options that you list. When I look at those options, I dont understand what you are saying about modelling as "THRU" and "THRU ALL". The only way I have seen to get "THRU" to show up in the hole callout is by giving "Up to Next" as the End Condition. If that is what you mean as "THRU", then I would hope to be able to control it another way.
For example, if I have a tube and I want to put a hole thru both walls, for ease, I give the "Through All" End Condition. That will give me a "Thru All" callout. But I want "Thru" callout. To get "Thru" callout, I have to use "Up to Next" as End Condition which will stop the hole after the first wall; not what I want. Now I am no draftsmen and do not know all the rules and maybe in that situation it is the correct way to call things out, but not all companies need to follow all drafting standards strictly. I would rather have the "Thru" show up as a default and add any clarifiers from there, such as "All", "Near and Far Walls", etc, whether correct drafting or not.
Basically what I want to know is if I can access the area that assigns "THRU ALL" to the <hw-thru> code/variable.
I appreciate all help, the long reply is to try to clarify what I am trying to do and explain our specific paradigm here.
Thanks,
Mike