Jim0210, I wish that the subject would be clear-cut, but unfortunately it is not. The confusion, I think, results from a mix up of causes and effects.
Both, a travelling pressure wave as well as a travelling
slug of liquid can produce pressure
surges resulting in water hammer.
This pipe pounding is actually initiated by the rapid stoppage of an incompressible flowing liquid and it can also occur in two-phase flows.
Conditions causing "water hammer" can be "hydraulic shocks" as mentioned by MortenA as from a sudden closing of a valve, "thermal shocks" and
"differential shocks". Thermal shocks generally are the result of a sudden condensation and collapse of steam bubbles trapped by pools of condensate below saturation. The ensuing drop in pressure accelerates the liquid condensate which impacts containing surfaces, sometimes chipping away protective oxide layers resulting in accelerated corrosion. I remember having seen this subject treated in another thread.
"Differential shocks" are the case in question here. When steam and condensate travel in parallel, steam usually has a much higher velocity. Liquid waves start to form, sometimes as an effect of thermal shock, and rise until they form a seal, in fact a
slug aka piston with pressure behind. This slug picks up more condensate increasing its mass on its way, at progressively increasing velocities. On changing directions, such as when encountering elbows, tees, or other fittings, the momentum is discharged and great damage can result. It can also happen when, in a vertical line discharging condensate from elevated heat exchangers, a sudden steam condensation occurs downstream because of the lack of insulation. This sudden pressure reduction plus gravity can result in an accelerated vertical slug of condensate carrying sufficient force to damage traps and other pipe appurtenances.
"Slug flow" biphase liquid-liquid or gas-liquid flow regimes not always cause water hammer. However, when two-phase
slug flows are indeed the cause of a water hammer
pressure surging, it wrongly appears that both expressions could equally apply.
When dealing with flows in pipes, it is preferable -as MortenA says- to reserve the
surge wording for travelling
pressure waves, and keep the
slug flow expression for travelling
slugs of liquid in biphase flow regimes, albeit their pounding effects are both usually included under the category of "water hammer".