grakson
Automotive
- Jan 16, 2008
- 14
Hi,
I know something about thermodynamic, fuel physical characteristics, so please try that answers/discusion will be of any use.
I tried to discuss about the topic on the other automotive forums, but people seem to know something and mostly I got cross-explanation of my former statements.
I would like to discuss (based on the thermodynamic laws), why some fuels are suitable for a particular engine design and other not or might be with some changes and modifications.
Nowadays manufacturers offer also CNG vehicles, especialy in a transit chategory.
So I will give some of my thinking, whic is really bunch of questions.
IF we put diesel fuel into an otto design engine, it probably won't run, due to the fact that there won't be enough air in the cylinder and also the problem will be the fuel vaporization as diesel fuel is a mixture of long carbon-hydrogen molecules and has low viscosity. But I thing that also the big problem will be autodetonation rather that spark, causing engine knock. Diesel autoignition point is lower that that of the gasoline.
If we put gasoline into diesel cylce engine, following will probabl occur. Due to the fact that gasoline is more viscosity, and its speed and temperature of burning is higher, it will cause explosive effect. The fuel will reacted with the oxygen too fast causing to high peak temperature and pressure, probably damage the engine.
What about monogas CNG engines. Its main component is methane which has high autoignition point (round 630°C), thus allowing manufacturers to build engines with higher compression ratio, up to 16 or 17. (I make this estimation based on the thermodynamic equation T2[K]=T1*(V1/V2)^k-1 k(air)~1,4). But as I can read NGV vehicles (Honda civic NGV=12,5), have lower compression, why?
Could we build higly efficient CNG engine with very high compression ratios? Will the problem be peak burning temperature?
Could we use diesel cylce engine to run on gasoline or CNG, where we will inject fuel stratified - meaning more time subordinate partly injections of fuel?
I know something about thermodynamic, fuel physical characteristics, so please try that answers/discusion will be of any use.
I tried to discuss about the topic on the other automotive forums, but people seem to know something and mostly I got cross-explanation of my former statements.
I would like to discuss (based on the thermodynamic laws), why some fuels are suitable for a particular engine design and other not or might be with some changes and modifications.
Nowadays manufacturers offer also CNG vehicles, especialy in a transit chategory.
So I will give some of my thinking, whic is really bunch of questions.
IF we put diesel fuel into an otto design engine, it probably won't run, due to the fact that there won't be enough air in the cylinder and also the problem will be the fuel vaporization as diesel fuel is a mixture of long carbon-hydrogen molecules and has low viscosity. But I thing that also the big problem will be autodetonation rather that spark, causing engine knock. Diesel autoignition point is lower that that of the gasoline.
If we put gasoline into diesel cylce engine, following will probabl occur. Due to the fact that gasoline is more viscosity, and its speed and temperature of burning is higher, it will cause explosive effect. The fuel will reacted with the oxygen too fast causing to high peak temperature and pressure, probably damage the engine.
What about monogas CNG engines. Its main component is methane which has high autoignition point (round 630°C), thus allowing manufacturers to build engines with higher compression ratio, up to 16 or 17. (I make this estimation based on the thermodynamic equation T2[K]=T1*(V1/V2)^k-1 k(air)~1,4). But as I can read NGV vehicles (Honda civic NGV=12,5), have lower compression, why?
Could we build higly efficient CNG engine with very high compression ratios? Will the problem be peak burning temperature?
Could we use diesel cylce engine to run on gasoline or CNG, where we will inject fuel stratified - meaning more time subordinate partly injections of fuel?