Thank you very much for your attempt to assist, although I might still be struggling to clarify my question.
Based on the findings of the Fire and Explosion Risk Assessment (FERA) study, different levels of radiation contours are associated with specific actions and considerations:
4.7 kW/m2 Radiation Contour: Chance of fatality for instant exposure. Pain threshold in less than 2s.
12.5 kW/m2 Radiation Contour: Typical fatality threshold, for normally clothed people, resulting in third degree burns after 30 seconds exposure. Significant chance of fatality for extended exposure. Pain threshold reached in 3-4s.
37.5 kW/m2 Radiation Contour: Chance of fatality for instant exposure. Pain threshold in less than 2s.
To ensure the effectiveness of fire-fighting systems and to prevent the escalation of fire hazards, a reference radiation contour of 12.5 kW/m2 is commonly employed for design purposes. Critical fire-fighting equipment must be positioned outside this contour to optimize their performance. Furthermore, meticulous attention should be given to the 4.7 kW/m2 contour, aiding in determining the strategic placement of fire-fighting devices requiring swift human intervention within 2-3 minutes. It's essential to note that within the 6.3 kW/m2 contour, specific precautions are warranted. In these areas, firefighting equipment's positioning might demand personnel exposure. Adequately attired with safety gear such as hard hats, long-sleeved shirts, full-length pants, and appropriate footwear, personnel may need to engage in emergency actions lasting up to 30 seconds.
the question Is it feasible to place fire hydrants within the ALARP Zone (10^-4 or 0.0001 risk level contour) or within the 12.5 kW/m2 radiation contour? Additionally, what precautions should be taken into consideration in such a scenario?