rockman: For the kind of data you're looking for, the industry standards are not going to give you what you want - nor are the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). This is because there is a "design" life expectancy, and then there is the "real world" life expectancy. Most of the time, the OEM doesn't get to hear back when their equipment fails, or why it fails, or even what the user was doing with it at the time. However, the repair facilities that are tasked with either repairing or maintaining the equipment should have a reasonable idea about how long a specific type of equipment may last - and even whether the period varies from one manufacturer to another. This is because they DO see the failures (and what it was doing at the time) - and often keep records so the next time they see a certain failure mode or device they can fix it faster or more effectively.
The reason the standards are not likely to help you is that they are - almost exclusively - written as "performance" standards, and - as they are developed as a consensus between users, manufacturers, government, and academia - default to the lowest common denominator (or the "minimum acceptable" condition). Finally, a large proportion of standards (such as IEEE and IEC) seldom contain the word "shall" - instead, they use "should" or "may". What they means is that most things are not really requirements - at best, they are strong suggestions, based on current science and accumulated practical experience.
The only "standard" that I know of that might come close to what you're seeking is the Naval Surface Warfare Center (Carderock Division) "Handbook of Reliability Prediction Procedures for Mechanical Equipment".
Converting energy to motion for more than half a century