steve1
Structural
- Jul 25, 2001
- 261
How appropriate is a stress based criteria for the design of buried piping? I am reviewing a design of a casing pipe (30 inch diameter) that will be jacked 7 feet below a RR grade crossing. The link below, which has been mentioned in other threads here, presents a stress based criteria for the checking of buried steel piping. The suggested acceptance criteria presented in Appendix A specifically notes that an allowable deformation or strain is not applicable to earth loads (static, live, surface impact).
This is in direct contradiction to the RR specs that the design was based on. The RR specs are based on an allowable deformation of 3% of the casing pipe diameter.
As it turns out the casing pipe meets the RR spec but fails the through wall bending criteria.
Should we require thicker and higher grade of steel to meet the guidelines below?
This is in direct contradiction to the RR specs that the design was based on. The RR specs are based on an allowable deformation of 3% of the casing pipe diameter.
As it turns out the casing pipe meets the RR spec but fails the through wall bending criteria.
Should we require thicker and higher grade of steel to meet the guidelines below?