Muhammad@ZEL
Mechanical
- Jun 12, 2025
- 12
Hello all,
I’m working as a junior design engineer at a consultancy firm, and currently involved in the design of horizontal underground (buried) storage tanks for these products :
In addition to that, external pressure due to burial depth will also need to be considered (final depth is to be confirmed).
Also, the site is located in a rice-growing region, which typically has a high water table, so groundwater pressure acting on the tank is expected to be a significant factor in the design.
The tanks were buried due to:
We typically use PV Elite for detailed analysis, which is based on ASME Section VIII Division 1
If space wasn't a constraint and the tanks were installed aboveground, we would probably go for API 650
My Question
Thanks!
I’m working as a junior design engineer at a consultancy firm, and currently involved in the design of horizontal underground (buried) storage tanks for these products :
- Methanol
- Bio-Naphtha
- 5.1 m dia × 20 m long and 6.1 m dia × 20 m long
- Orientation: Horizontal
- Installation: Fully buried underground
In addition to that, external pressure due to burial depth will also need to be considered (final depth is to be confirmed).
Also, the site is located in a rice-growing region, which typically has a high water table, so groundwater pressure acting on the tank is expected to be a significant factor in the design.
The tanks were buried due to:
- Local regulations regarding boundary/fire distances
- Safety requirements in line with NFPA 30
- Limited plot space for aboveground layout
We typically use PV Elite for detailed analysis, which is based on ASME Section VIII Division 1
If space wasn't a constraint and the tanks were installed aboveground, we would probably go for API 650
My Question
- In this case, is it acceptable engineering practice to use ASME Section VIII instead of UL-58 for buried tanks — even when formal internal pressure is very low or close to atmospheric?
- Is this just an overdesign, or are there regulatory/compliance issues in using ASME VIII in place of UL-58?
- If there were no burial requirement, these tanks would likely be vertical, aboveground, and designed per API 650 — do others agree with that assumption?
- Do you have any references or experience with similar buried tanks for flammable liquids where ASME Section VIII was used intentionally over UL-58?
Thanks!