Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Deflection of beam check... 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bert2

Mechanical
Feb 17, 2010
80

Hi,

Its been a while since ive needed to calculate the defelection of a beam, in doing so i have came up with two quite different answers, using Macauleys and the direct deflection equation. calcs attached, any pointers in my errors would be soundly appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

thanks desertfox! great help as always!!!
 
Some belated comments on this problem:

- You really need to have an idea of the expected magnitude of deflections to pick up gross errors straight away, but even without that it's obvious that a deflection approaching 1 billion light years is a little on the high side.

- A few minutes entering the deflection formula in a spreadsheet would pick up the error with the sign of the exponents, but that then gives a deflection of 8.3E-18 mm, which is also obviously much too small, being much less than the diameter of an iron atom.

- The E value for steel used in the original calc was in Pa (N/m^2), whereas the load was in KN, so one or the other needs to be adjusted. This was obviously picked up in later iterations, but no-one mentioned it. Correcting this brings the deflection up to 8.3E-15 mm, but this is still obviously much too small.

- I don't know how the units of mm^4 for deflection in the original calc were arrived at, but this should have rung alarm bells, because it should have been in m (as the span length) and not raised to the fourth power.

- I don't agree that Macaulay's Method is inapplicable to this problem. With a uniform load over the full length it reduces to the integration method. It doesn't provide any advantage for this case, but checking this sort of simple example does provide a quick check that the method is being applied properly.

- I have recently posted a spreadsheet for analysing continuous beams using Macaulay's Method on my blog. It now allows for single or multi-span beams with cantilevers and spring supports (translation and/or rotation) and optionally shear deflection. There are six posts on the subject, the first one (including a link to the latest version of the spreadsheet) being:

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor