rattler
Mechanical
- Oct 8, 2003
- 33
Hi,
I'm doing some check analysis on a cylindrical housing under external pressure (subsea); the radius / wall thickness ratio is approximately 8.
I have the capability to do static FE analysis which will predict stresses however I'm not convinced that if I compare these with material yield strength or UTS it will give me relevant a safety factor against "failure". I believe the failure mode is likely to be buckling.
I don't have the software to undertake buckling analysis however I've found a formula for critical buckling pressure for a thin tube under external pressure (roark Table 35 case 19); this only applies for thin cylinders with r/t > 10.
Can anyone advise please if the following approach is correct?
1. Calculate the critical pressure using a lower value of thickness such that r/t = 11
2. Assuming that gives me a good margin against my actual pressure, conclude that my cylinder has a greater margin because it is actually thicker.
Or is the reality more complicated?
Thanks.
I'm doing some check analysis on a cylindrical housing under external pressure (subsea); the radius / wall thickness ratio is approximately 8.
I have the capability to do static FE analysis which will predict stresses however I'm not convinced that if I compare these with material yield strength or UTS it will give me relevant a safety factor against "failure". I believe the failure mode is likely to be buckling.
I don't have the software to undertake buckling analysis however I've found a formula for critical buckling pressure for a thin tube under external pressure (roark Table 35 case 19); this only applies for thin cylinders with r/t > 10.
Can anyone advise please if the following approach is correct?
1. Calculate the critical pressure using a lower value of thickness such that r/t = 11
2. Assuming that gives me a good margin against my actual pressure, conclude that my cylinder has a greater margin because it is actually thicker.
Or is the reality more complicated?
Thanks.