Settingsun
Structural
- Aug 25, 2013
- 1,513
Hi all,
I'm starting to look at FRP-reinforced concrete and the specified standard is CSA S806-12. I don't understand how the factored bending resistance is intended to be calculated if a concrete stress-strain curve is used per clause 8.4.1.6.
In clause 6.5.1, I think the first paragraph says that (generally) an overall capacity reduction factor is applied to the nominal (best estimate) section strength. The second paragraph then says that partial material factors are to be used instead where specified. However, I could alternatively read both paragraphs as saying that partial material factors are used, but with the second paragraph drawing attention to the additional phi.m factor from CSA A23.3.
Clause 8.4.1.5 (rectangular stress block) has the phi.c factor built into the concrete stress, so is a partial material factor. The rectangular stress block is however optional ("may" be used). Clause 8.4.1.6 says that concrete stress shall be based on stress-strain curves that are representative of the concrete used. Again not clear to me whether "based on" means to use curves that are accurate (which would rule out partial material factors, therefore implying an overall factor), or if it means that a partial material factor should be applied to the accurate curve.
On balance, I lean towards partial material factors being the intention and I understand that the Canadian code for steel-reinforced concrete uses this, but the wording is just unclear to me and I have a nagging doubt that the very-different behaviour of FRP might have warranted a different approach.
I'm starting to look at FRP-reinforced concrete and the specified standard is CSA S806-12. I don't understand how the factored bending resistance is intended to be calculated if a concrete stress-strain curve is used per clause 8.4.1.6.
In clause 6.5.1, I think the first paragraph says that (generally) an overall capacity reduction factor is applied to the nominal (best estimate) section strength. The second paragraph then says that partial material factors are to be used instead where specified. However, I could alternatively read both paragraphs as saying that partial material factors are used, but with the second paragraph drawing attention to the additional phi.m factor from CSA A23.3.
Clause 8.4.1.5 (rectangular stress block) has the phi.c factor built into the concrete stress, so is a partial material factor. The rectangular stress block is however optional ("may" be used). Clause 8.4.1.6 says that concrete stress shall be based on stress-strain curves that are representative of the concrete used. Again not clear to me whether "based on" means to use curves that are accurate (which would rule out partial material factors, therefore implying an overall factor), or if it means that a partial material factor should be applied to the accurate curve.
On balance, I lean towards partial material factors being the intention and I understand that the Canadian code for steel-reinforced concrete uses this, but the wording is just unclear to me and I have a nagging doubt that the very-different behaviour of FRP might have warranted a different approach.