Goodmorning,
i'm new in that forum and i'm writing this post to have your feedback about the interpretation of the CSA 22.1 - rule 4-006 regarding the design of power cables.
According to that rules 4-006 point 1) the allowable ampacity of a cables depends on the temperature rating of the terminals in which it's connected, and in the point 4) of the same rule is clarified that the requirement of point 1) is relevant only to the first 1.2 m of the cables from the terminals connection.
Now, i've to design a cables (90°C type) that is routed from and electrical building to a motors in field. I've individuate n°3 different section of the cable routing path:
1) the first one is the routing inside the electrical building, in which the cable laid with few cables in a cable trays and is connected to the MCC terminals (75°rated) and is subject to the indoor temperature
2) the second part is the outdoor path of the routing in which the cable laid with other cables in a cable trays and is subject to the ambient temperature and cables at 90°C
3) the third one is the terminal path in which the cable run alone in order to reach the motor terminals (still at the outdoor temperature)- terminals (75°rated)
For all path i've calculate the right ampacity, according to the CSA 22.1 tables.
Now according to my interpretation of the rule 4-006 the right design of the cables id the lowest ampacity value between the three values calculated for the path above described.
.
My colleague instead claims that the right design of the cable is defined by the ampacity table relevant to 75°C (due to terminals ratings) and the installation method of outdoor path.
in my opinion is not correct, because it not consider point 4) of subrule 4-006.
Since we are not familiar with CSA standards, could you please clarify which approach is correct?
thank you,
Alessandro.
i'm new in that forum and i'm writing this post to have your feedback about the interpretation of the CSA 22.1 - rule 4-006 regarding the design of power cables.
According to that rules 4-006 point 1) the allowable ampacity of a cables depends on the temperature rating of the terminals in which it's connected, and in the point 4) of the same rule is clarified that the requirement of point 1) is relevant only to the first 1.2 m of the cables from the terminals connection.
Now, i've to design a cables (90°C type) that is routed from and electrical building to a motors in field. I've individuate n°3 different section of the cable routing path:
1) the first one is the routing inside the electrical building, in which the cable laid with few cables in a cable trays and is connected to the MCC terminals (75°rated) and is subject to the indoor temperature
2) the second part is the outdoor path of the routing in which the cable laid with other cables in a cable trays and is subject to the ambient temperature and cables at 90°C
3) the third one is the terminal path in which the cable run alone in order to reach the motor terminals (still at the outdoor temperature)- terminals (75°rated)
For all path i've calculate the right ampacity, according to the CSA 22.1 tables.
Now according to my interpretation of the rule 4-006 the right design of the cables id the lowest ampacity value between the three values calculated for the path above described.
.
My colleague instead claims that the right design of the cable is defined by the ampacity table relevant to 75°C (due to terminals ratings) and the installation method of outdoor path.
in my opinion is not correct, because it not consider point 4) of subrule 4-006.
Since we are not familiar with CSA standards, could you please clarify which approach is correct?
thank you,
Alessandro.