asixth
Structural
- Feb 27, 2008
- 1,333
Hi guys,
I have a situation where some isolated 800 x 300 reinforced concrete columns (2.5' x 1') have been offset from the gridline. There are no architectural requirements to have these columns this dimension at this particular location, so I was wondering if it would be more economical to provide a 400 x 400 (1.25' x 1.25') square column in this location if it is easier to form and build and therefore, reduce cost.
What is the contibuting factor to the cost of reinforced concrete columns, should I call up all columns the same dimension for the re-use of forms or would reducing the material used be more economical?
I have a situation where some isolated 800 x 300 reinforced concrete columns (2.5' x 1') have been offset from the gridline. There are no architectural requirements to have these columns this dimension at this particular location, so I was wondering if it would be more economical to provide a 400 x 400 (1.25' x 1.25') square column in this location if it is easier to form and build and therefore, reduce cost.
What is the contibuting factor to the cost of reinforced concrete columns, should I call up all columns the same dimension for the re-use of forms or would reducing the material used be more economical?