Urban5oo... observation...
RE this comment You made...
"...During previous missions in this area has caused corrosion damage on a lot of parts of the helicopter including landing gear pistons, various bearings, new wheel rims, gearbox etc. things that normally never corrode..."
The naval environment is exceptionally severe. It sound like these acft were either: (a) never intended to be flown as naval aircraft (Army or USAF missions primarily)... but were adapted to this naval mission for unique reasons [unknown to us] without appropriate consideration of the corrosive environment; or (b) the OEM/Navy failed to specify/apply rigorous corrosion prevention measures [for the naval environment] such as frequent cleaning [water washes, solvent washes, etc], increased frequency lubrication, special added temp coatings [CPC, etc], wipe coatings of lubricant fluids, etc.
A similar trend was noted with a USAF helo adapted from an Army variant, flown in an abrasive-seacoast environment: massive corrosion issues were noted. Boiled down to the fact that the USN/USCG versions were built with significantly greater corrosion protection for the naval environment [better coatings, assy practices, special maintenance requirements, etc, etc] … which were not applied to the USAF or USA variants… even when they could be operated in a similar environment. Sure’nuf the aircraft deteriorated rapidly.
Regards, Wil Taylor
Trust Me! I'm an engineer!
Trust - But Verify!
We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.
For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.
Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant – "Orion"