As a further note, you are doing yourself a favor by working on a mass basis (BTU/lb rather than BTU/cuft) for hydrocarbon gases. Mass directly reflects on carbon atoms and the number of bonds to be broken. JLSeagull's last post "bigger molecules have a higher heating value per cuft" shows this. If hydrogen is not present (very high BTU/lb but very low BTU/cuft) then you can use methane's net HV of 21,500 BTU/lb with acceptable accuracy for many calculations even with a good amount of ethane or propane present. My experience anyway.
best wishes,
sshep