preynolds
Structural
- Oct 1, 2001
- 44
I need a sanity check.
Situation presents itself in several construction types, particularly with load bearing precast wall panels and masonry load bearing walls.
For the joist bearing side, I am of the opinion that a continuous angle must be present to transfer diaphragm forces from the deck into the joist with the joist taking the force into the walls (provided joist rollover is sufficient). When examining older buildings, we often see no continuous element of that described.
For the deck bearing side, there will typically be a continuous angle for bearing, thus you have your continuous chord element.
Am I correct in the direction? I just don't see how one can use the deck itself as the boundary element on a diaphragm.
In the existing building condition, when you see an angle is not present, what do you do?
Situation presents itself in several construction types, particularly with load bearing precast wall panels and masonry load bearing walls.
For the joist bearing side, I am of the opinion that a continuous angle must be present to transfer diaphragm forces from the deck into the joist with the joist taking the force into the walls (provided joist rollover is sufficient). When examining older buildings, we often see no continuous element of that described.
For the deck bearing side, there will typically be a continuous angle for bearing, thus you have your continuous chord element.
Am I correct in the direction? I just don't see how one can use the deck itself as the boundary element on a diaphragm.
In the existing building condition, when you see an angle is not present, what do you do?