jdgengineer
Structural
- Dec 1, 2011
- 748
I know versions of this question have been asked on here in the past, but I thought I would post again for clarity. When you have a steel wide flange beam running continuously over the top of an HSS beam do you put in only web-stiffeners and design the stiffener as a "continuation" of the column to provide necessary beam bottom flange bracing, or do you put in the stiffeners and an additional brace (say perpendicular beam or diagonal kicker)?
Chapter 2 of AISC 360 seems to indicate that the stiffener only approach is acceptable (and this is what I commonly see). On page 2-21 of AISC 360-10 "...The required stability can be provided with stiffeners in the beam web along with a moment connection between the column top and beam bottom to maintain alignment of the beam/column assembly. A cap plate of reasonable proportions and four bolts will normally suffice".
However, commentary to J10.4 on page 16.1-418 says "If flange rotation is permitted at the loaded flange, neither stiffeners nor doubler plates are effective".
Does anyone have thoughts on this?
Chapter 2 of AISC 360 seems to indicate that the stiffener only approach is acceptable (and this is what I commonly see). On page 2-21 of AISC 360-10 "...The required stability can be provided with stiffeners in the beam web along with a moment connection between the column top and beam bottom to maintain alignment of the beam/column assembly. A cap plate of reasonable proportions and four bolts will normally suffice".
However, commentary to J10.4 on page 16.1-418 says "If flange rotation is permitted at the loaded flange, neither stiffeners nor doubler plates are effective".
Does anyone have thoughts on this?