Thanks for posting this. I am more of a CAD designer than a CM professional, so it is basically 'over my head'. I know that from small to large organizations, most folks consider more old-school comparisons of methods that force all of the organization to use one BoM (Frank Watts) or linked systems that give the various groups in the organization more latitude (David Garwood). Since I am not able to comprehend the paper very well, I am somewhat frustrated and want to make a rather unhelpful comment: The paper takes us closer to a highly automated system where customer requirements are processed digitally into a 'house of quality', design automation processes use algorithms to produce a robust design, additional algorithms optimize the factory floor given materials and tools, and driverless trucks deliver the goods to the customer. All that is left to do is to automate consumerism. Sorry to be rather negative. I do like my 3D CAD and enjoy many benefits of technology. My concern is that the human species needs to evolve or most of us will serve technology, rather than the other way around. So when the complexity goes over my head, I can't but react negatively. I do sense that the system envisioned could be part of next-generation business analysis software that might execute, or assist (the better option, in my opinion), planning that would benefit Wall Street, if no one else. Nevertheless, thanks again for posting this. Perhaps it will add clarity to what/how decisions are made, even now, as we try to do things better. I hope my response does not keep you from wanting to influence our evolution for the better, I am sure.
Peter Truitt
Minnesota