Wrote this before KRS latest but will send anyway. I agree that specs should be job oriented but not too many will take the time for something as "mundane" as testing intervals to change the previous spec. Contractor here has to do the testing per the MOST noted below. We view all tests in field and view testing in lab. We also will, from time to time, direct another set of cylinders - oops, cubes -- in the field as a check. On most international jobs I have been posted on, contractor is responsible for testing, RE staff does occasional tests to confirm. Team Leader then does (orders) an occasional test, too. I will still send as earlier written just to bring out some points.
++++++++++++++++
Confirmation of items in my earlier post – and apologies for my feeble mind!!
AASHTO (T141) specifies that sampling be a composite of two or more regularly spaced portions within a specified time frame (less than 15 minutes). The various portions are then mixed together to form a composite. For air and slump, an initial sample “may be taken after at least ¼ cubic yard or concrete has been discharged.” – not the ½ yd that I put in my earlier post – sorry.
Indian Standards (IS 1199) states “At least three approximately equal sample increments totaling 0.02m3 shall be taken from a batch during its discharge . . . Where three sample increments are taken they shall be taken at about the time when ¼, ½ and ¾ of the concrete has been discharged . . .” The samples are then made into a composite sample.
I give the IS so that we may see that different countries do have slightly different procedures. For instance, ASTM/AASTO do slumps in 3 layers; IS is in 4 layers. Normal Indian practice is to use cubes, not cylinders. Need to correct – approximately: 80% cube strength = cylinder strength (i.e., 30MPa cube = 24MPa cylinder). Ratio is somewhat higher at higher strengths (say 90% at cylinder strength >35 MPa but most here just use the 80% value. This is important to correlate specifically if you have a mixed bag as sometimes may happen in SE Asia depending on origin of contractor. One other difference is curing temps after initial 24hr – at AASHTO/ASTM it is 23degC plus or minus 1.7degC (AASHTO T23); in India it is 27degC plus or minus 2degC (IS516). This really takes into account the more typical ambient temperatures in India – probably so not so much ice or chillers are needed.
As for number of tests, MOST (Indian Ministry of Surface Transport Specs for Road and Bridge Works, 3rd Revision) states: The MINIMUM frequency of sampling of concrete of each grade shall be:
1 – 5 m3 in works: 1 sample
6 – 15 m3 in works: 2 samples
16 – 30 m3 in works: 3 samples
31 – 50 m3 in works: 4 samples
>51 m3 in works: 4 samples plus 1 sample for each added 50m3 or part thereof.
Here, the auditors would say that if you had 52 m3 in works, do 5 samples. Note, too, that this is per “works”. If contractor does three bridge parapet walls, say 11m3 each, he would be required to do 3 x 2 samples even of same class concrete.
On another international job – it was 1 sample per day of each mix used, at least 1 sample per 50m3 of concrete placed for reinforced and prestressed concrete, at least 1 sample per 100m3 for mass concrete; at least one sample from each pier cap, column and abutment, at least one set from each precast element. If same grade is used at two or more places on same structure – at least one set subject to above. For small works, say culvert headwalls and do several in day – at least 1 sample for each class. The fallacy in this particular job was that each 0.125m3 was mixed individually in portable mixers – we had, due to extreme remote locations, no ready mix!
KRS: Your 1 sample per 150m3 seems pretty liberal!!! (Point taken that your 1 per 150m3 was for client confirmation). I couldn’t find my CSA book – lent it out so can’t confirm CSA requirements.
Hope this helps – it shows that engineers/country practice/organization practice, once again, vary widely in opinions and requirements for such common and routine items as this.
p.s. (1) Can anyone tell me how I report, in accordance with AASHTO T22, a test result (7 day or 28day) to the nearest 69kPa? (viz., 0.069MPa)? I queried AASHTO and got a snide remark in return.
(2) Does anyone have a handle on maximum flakiness and elongation combined? KRS??? DirtDoc1???? This is becoming a great “audit” concern of ours: specs say 25% combined; we can’t get anything under 30 to 35% (have tried four quarry sources! – rock is not siltstone/slate, or laminated). Mixes are workable; strengths are all in accordance with spec values but worries abound about hand slaps. I have a thread in civil related on this for some details. Thanks.