I have a hard time imagining a reasonable fix that would restore the intent of integrity reinforcing. New beams column to column would do it but it’s hard to imagine that being acceptable. It’s doubly bad because you’ve probably lost the bar twice. Once on the side of the column where the core is at and once on the other side of the column where anchorage will be insufficient.
My first stop would be to recalculate the demand as tight as possible and compare that to the total number of bars going both directions. One bar in, say, six isn’t so bad. I’d probably let that go. Integrity reinforcing is hardly an exact science. Most reinforcement strategies would probably just weaken the connection anyhow.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.