lattimer
Structural
- Feb 26, 2018
- 3
I'm a steel and concrete guy, and looking at a problem regarding piers for a residence I found something that doesn't quite jive with my "common-sense-o-meter".
The residence in question is a 1900s era post and beam house, founded on highly questionable rubble piers. Frost is 48". Girders are roughly 3' above grade. State/city have adopted IRC.
2015 IRC R404.1.9.2 States that "piers supporting girders for exterior bearing walls shall have a minimum nominal dimension of 12 inches and a maximum height of 4 feet from the top of footing to the bottom of sill plate or girder."
Has anyone seen any clarifications on this? Are CMU piers effectively banned in certain areas now, since we certainly would not want timber girders sitting at grade.
The residence in question is a 1900s era post and beam house, founded on highly questionable rubble piers. Frost is 48". Girders are roughly 3' above grade. State/city have adopted IRC.
2015 IRC R404.1.9.2 States that "piers supporting girders for exterior bearing walls shall have a minimum nominal dimension of 12 inches and a maximum height of 4 feet from the top of footing to the bottom of sill plate or girder."
Has anyone seen any clarifications on this? Are CMU piers effectively banned in certain areas now, since we certainly would not want timber girders sitting at grade.