I need to modify a piece of equipment to include a circuit for an additional piece. The equipment is powered at 460VAC, 3-phase. The original equipment contains one step-down xfmr to 120VAC, and is protected by two primary and one secondary fuses. The add-on is 120VAC, nearly 10A max inrush. It is 120VAC input with a controller that powers a couple of 24VDC motors. Can someone tell me, or point me to the standard for circuit protection?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
circuit protection for new branch
- Thread starter QGeek
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #2
I found a great article on sizing circuit protection for transformers and their loads:
In it, a helpful standard is listed:
Circuit breaker protection for the primary side of the transformer can be
sized per NEC (National Electrical Code) Article 450-3(b)(2) which states:
”All transformers of 600V, nominal, or less, shall be protected by an
individual overcurrent device on the primary side . . .”
In it, a helpful standard is listed:
Circuit breaker protection for the primary side of the transformer can be
sized per NEC (National Electrical Code) Article 450-3(b)(2) which states:
”All transformers of 600V, nominal, or less, shall be protected by an
individual overcurrent device on the primary side . . .”
Be careful, there...
It would be most helpful if you posted a schematic of your proposed system. Then we can give you advice if needed.
Best to you,
Goober Dave
Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies
It would be most helpful if you posted a schematic of your proposed system. Then we can give you advice if needed.
Best to you,
Goober Dave
Haven't see the forum policies? Do so now: Forum Policies
If you (and the equipment) are in NEC land, then yes, NEC 450 is good. However, for small control transformers, the max fuse allowed is pretty high.
Unless you are inside of a panel - then you need to follow the panel listing, maybe look at UL508A
Unless you can't (follow the panel listing) - then probably NEC 409, NFPA 79.
Personally I like tight primary and secondary protection of control transformers. Smoked (overloaded or internally failed) control transformers have a nasty habit of burning up the insides of control panels - while not manageing to open the fuses. Nearly iratating.
Some likely would think it is way overkill, but I don't mind getting out a fuse TCC, and verifying the energization is within the fuse rating - especially if I had not done one before.
This way you could consider it engineering - not design by regulation, which usually is not a good idea.
ice
Harmless flakes working together can unleash an avalanche of destruction
Unless you are inside of a panel - then you need to follow the panel listing, maybe look at UL508A
Unless you can't (follow the panel listing) - then probably NEC 409, NFPA 79.
Personally I like tight primary and secondary protection of control transformers. Smoked (overloaded or internally failed) control transformers have a nasty habit of burning up the insides of control panels - while not manageing to open the fuses. Nearly iratating.
Some likely would think it is way overkill, but I don't mind getting out a fuse TCC, and verifying the energization is within the fuse rating - especially if I had not done one before.
This way you could consider it engineering - not design by regulation, which usually is not a good idea.
ice
Harmless flakes working together can unleash an avalanche of destruction
- Status
Similar threads
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Question