Thank you guys very much for such fast and thorough replies!
@looslib & @ Tomerl :: I am not 100 % familiar with the Teamcenter (TC) (just using it as it is commanded) and probably I did not defined properly action of 'exporting'. I should, I guess, said "transfering" parts to other department - which I guess is constituded with merely 'transfering' of some arguments - let say ownership and so on. So, to summarize, we will transfer purely NX 6.0 native files (3D models with separated files with 2D drawings, which is common in TC). We were also told that in some near future "checking function" will be obligatory in Teamcenter, so parts will have to meet some requirements from these checks. Currently this is not so, but they're planning to do so - our sister department is most probably already preparing for this. Currently entire assembly has approx. 200 parts, of which some (about 20 to 30 of them) are pretty complex (within of world of industrial design (in household appliances), of course), and during development and premanufacturing phases gained some nonparameterized features, which are well defined in NX itself. For instance if we in one time simply remove parameters to one solid body, then it simply becomes nonparameterized feature, which is hard, as I've said, to rebuild from scratch with ordinary NX features (Extrudes with Booleans, Revolves, Edge Blends, ..., and even with new synchronous ones). So forget translators. I am talking about nonparameterized features in NX itself.
@JohnRBaker :: I do not know how do checking utilities in other companies look like, and ours is I think custom made - but nevertheless checking nonparameterized structure can not be much different as components which deal them are the same for every NX. We currently also do not use any KF tools. Although in Check-Mate Author Tools this 'standard' checker is listed (and there are 153 files of type DFA in checkmate subdfolder (of course in "read only" mode for ordinary user), which are I guess components of this particular 'check-mate', and which currently has 81 items in Validation Results).
I also do not understand 1000% for instance what is difference between fully correct nonparameterized body and its parameterized counterpart, if we forget parameterization, and think of for instance usability (exporting with translators, generating CNC codes, STL, ...) of this body. And of cource from this - what in fact we gain if we please these kind of checkers for parameterization? A lot of reparameterization is now possible via synchronous functions, and we do not have full nonparameterized stuff, so why checking this, if 3D models are otherwise satisfactory. Actions like this take precolus time from developers, designers and other ordinary technician-mortals
Best regards.
