Thanks for the reply. However, your answer seems to contradict itself. You agree that pumps don't "suck," yet you say they reduce the pressure at the inlet allowing system pressure to "push" more liquid into the pump. But if the system HAS pressure, then why does the pump need to reduce the pressure at the inlet. That sounds like "suction" to me. A baby sucks a bottle by "reducing" the pressure at the nipple to vacuum (by drawing back his tongue), thereby allowing bottle (system) pressure to push liquid into his mouth.
Here's how I thought a centrifugal pump worked. The pump takes liquid entrained in the impellers and throws it out the discharge, thereby allowing more liquid to be pushed into the pump. If the pump doesn't move liquid out of the suction, then there is no flow into the suction. The pressure at the suction is that which would normally be there if the pump were there or not (the pressure as a result of friction loss, elevation change, etc.).
A positive displacement pump, I believe, DOES suck, since it displaces air as well as liquid, creating a stronger and stronger vacuum (to a point), thereby pulling liquid into the pump.
Thanks for the Cameron Hydraulic Data reference, I will certainly check it out. If my logic above is hosed, please feel free to un-hose it.
Thanks,
John