-
1
- #1
rotw
Mechanical
- May 25, 2013
- 1,143
Hello,
I have a flow diagram situation for centrifugal compressor line as follows;
From upstream to downstream the gas flows first through a suction knock out drum, gas is compressed and then cooled (after cooler); after that the export gas goes through a final knock out drum and is then exported to another unit downstream (for treatment).
The process gas is rich natural gas and the machine is feed service / boosting basically.
This is a downstream segment oil and gas application. At the compressor suction knock out drum location there is enough margin to dew point when looking at temperature and pressure conditions and gas composition(s).
Currently the anti surge line return has the tie-in point upstream the suction knock out drum. While the take off is downstream the compressor after-cooler.
I am thinking to move the tie-in point at the compressor suction line from upstream the knock out drum (present configuration) to downstream the knock out drum. Thinking is that the gas which is recycled, when it is recycled (anti-surge line), shall return to approximately the operating temperatures and pressures of compressor at suction therefore margin to dew point should be okay so if there is any condensation occurring due to after-cooling it will recover to the vapor phase area soon after the pressure is dropped in the anti-surge valve.
Why doing this ? we do have two identical trains (main and stand by) but one common knock out drum for both trains at suction (poor design, difficult and late to correct now) - I want each machine to have a dedicated anti-surge loop with dedicated automatic isolation valves per loop (and outside the loop) so that one machine can run normally while the other is operated with the isolation valves in blocked-in configuration. With a common knock out pot at suction there seems to be stability issue if the stand by machine is started and main machine is running as the later will absorb the flow of the stand by machine while being started pushing it to surge till it comes online during a switch between main and stand by machines.
Back to anti surge tie-in issue, I feel I am overlooking something by doing his and is not good practice to by pass he suction knock out drum in the anti-surge line return ; can anyone help ? Thanks
I have a flow diagram situation for centrifugal compressor line as follows;
From upstream to downstream the gas flows first through a suction knock out drum, gas is compressed and then cooled (after cooler); after that the export gas goes through a final knock out drum and is then exported to another unit downstream (for treatment).
The process gas is rich natural gas and the machine is feed service / boosting basically.
This is a downstream segment oil and gas application. At the compressor suction knock out drum location there is enough margin to dew point when looking at temperature and pressure conditions and gas composition(s).
Currently the anti surge line return has the tie-in point upstream the suction knock out drum. While the take off is downstream the compressor after-cooler.
I am thinking to move the tie-in point at the compressor suction line from upstream the knock out drum (present configuration) to downstream the knock out drum. Thinking is that the gas which is recycled, when it is recycled (anti-surge line), shall return to approximately the operating temperatures and pressures of compressor at suction therefore margin to dew point should be okay so if there is any condensation occurring due to after-cooling it will recover to the vapor phase area soon after the pressure is dropped in the anti-surge valve.
Why doing this ? we do have two identical trains (main and stand by) but one common knock out drum for both trains at suction (poor design, difficult and late to correct now) - I want each machine to have a dedicated anti-surge loop with dedicated automatic isolation valves per loop (and outside the loop) so that one machine can run normally while the other is operated with the isolation valves in blocked-in configuration. With a common knock out pot at suction there seems to be stability issue if the stand by machine is started and main machine is running as the later will absorb the flow of the stand by machine while being started pushing it to surge till it comes online during a switch between main and stand by machines.
Back to anti surge tie-in issue, I feel I am overlooking something by doing his and is not good practice to by pass he suction knock out drum in the anti-surge line return ; can anyone help ? Thanks