To BigInch, you're not wrong.
One of the items I recall in that thread refers to the fact that saturated water at a higher temperature (and pressure) with about the same NPSHA causes less cavitation damage than cold water.
The proposed reason can be exemplified when comparing water at 10
oC vs water at 90
oC. It is a bit exaggerated, anyhow...
The specific volume of saturated steam at 10
oC is 45 times larger than that at 90
oC. The latent heat at 90
oC is just about 92% of that at 10
oC.
Therefore to produce at 90
oC the same volume of vapor bubbles than at 10
oC one needs to add about 41 times the heat.
Since the residence time of the liquid at the lower pressure zone inside the pump is very short, the net resulting effect is a lower cavitation intensity at 90
oC due to a lower volume of imploding bubbles.
The other point was that raised by Mr Montemayor on adding an inert (hardly dissolvable) gas on top of a liquified petroleum gas (also in equilibrium, e.g., saturated) to improve the normally very low NPSHA values.
Plus a lot of good advice by others...
I hope this short message saves you time in reading the whole thread.
![[smile] [smile] [smile]](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)