Hey, not all architects are sitting around picking out pretty colors! When I got out of school, with a BS/Arch, I went to work for a structural consultant that specialized in erection procedure and failure analysis. I modeled failures as well as inspected may structures, from waste digesters to bridges, for all types of distress. I’ve spent long hours in a crane or manlift in Chicago winters trying to find stress cracks in steel structures. I spent seven years doing structural steel shops drawings. My boss was a former chief engineer at American Bridge and Iron. It was an excellent training ground.
Maybe not all architects have had such experience in engineering and failure analysis, and certainly not many female architects, but you can’t start bashing them all or I’m gonna have to start bi!ch slappin’ ya.
Actually, I don’t mean to rant too much, but I don’t like to see the polical/CYA turn the investigation has taken. I think it taints what should be a purely scientific endeavor, regardless of liability. Analyze what happened without first looking to see who has the most money or who you can blame for the most political gain.
And I have some really bad news from the West Coast where I no live. I have received a couple of email from friends I consider intelligent asking me if I heard that it must have been a terrorist bomb and that the Bush administration is keeping secret the real death toll of almost 100 people. I try to explain the current and far more likey theories, but not many are listening.
My new sign off, “For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who do not, no proof is possible.”
"If you are going to walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!"