athomas236:
Kudos to you and DSB123 for for your straight and truthful candor.
I hope IMV doesn't take your excellent and honest reply as an affront to his intelligence. I believe all of us "old timers" - who have been there and done that - heartily agree on the fact that your response is strictly meant to help and aid young engineers who might erroneously entertain the idea that there is indeed a Simulation God that solves all problems at the touch of a mouse button and follows up by taking all responsibility and liability for the final results.
There is a guy in thread124-145495 seeking to simulate the amount of chemical needed to control the pH in a TEG unit (natural gas dehydration). This is analogous to having a simulator resolve the question of when to fire up the boiler, turn it up, turn it down, add chemicals, blow it down, change fuels, and ultimately shut it down. That way we could fire everybody, keep all the salaries + benefits to ourselves and blame the damn simulator when anything went wrong. We could also simulate our careers such that we wouldn't have to work - but simply invest our money safely in a profitable stock program designed, operated, and warranted by HySys. Now, wouldn't that be nice?
There is something grossly wrong when a human being starts to believe that a computer program is an entity unto itself and can actually reason and compete with a human in arriving at good engineering judgement and common sense. It's as if God had created computers. As if there are no such things as "up-grades" and "Beta Tests". Mental laziness knows no limits and it's a shame that it can de-rail potentially good engineers into false expectations.