jeffhed
Structural
- Mar 23, 2007
- 286
I have a project where a new aluminum beam is framing into an existing steel beam (perpendicular). The aluminum beam is fastened to the steel beam with an angle clip on each side of the beam. There is an existing 1/2" thick wood siding exterior that was going to be removed at the beam connection points and the new beams fastened directly to the steel beams. Apparently they have installed the clips over the top of the wood siding and the addition is competely installed and now the inspector is questioning the discrepancy. Before my connection worked fine. Now I am a little unsure how to analyze the connection. The wood will crush a lot easier than the steel or aluminum and has weakened the connection (trying to figure out exactly how much). If I transform the wood to steel, it is non existent compared to the steel and since it actually would increase the steel thickness a small amount it would increase the connection capacity so that way doesn't seem correct. If I transform the steel to wood then the calculations will look at bearing failure in the wood which can really only happen in the 1/2" wood siding so that doesn't seem completely correct either. The third option seems to be to calculate the capacity in the 1/2" wood by itself but this feels a little too conservative becuase I won't be able to get the connection to work in the 1/2" thick wood. In my mind the screws are almost cantilevering from the steel beam through the wood since the wood is so much softer than the steel but maybe this is also too conservative. But thinking of it this way also makes me concerned that wind pressures and fatigue could be a problem? Has anyone looked at something similar to this before (I'm sure someone has)? What is the correct way to analyze the connection to determine how much weaker the connection is? It's almost like a double shear problem but load is only on one side.