Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Balancing of centrifugal compressor rotor

Status
Not open for further replies.

OrangeNL

Mechanical
Mar 8, 2011
1
I have two questions about the balancing of two centrifugal compressor rotors (Low Pressure stage and Medium/High Pressure stage) of a centrifugal compressor.

The above mentioned compressor will have a major maintenance overhaul this year and both rotors of the compressor will be balanced. They can be balanced low speed or high speed for substantial extra costs. I know this depends on whether the shafts can be considered rigid or flexible but how can one determine? I have also readt that flexible shafts can in some cases be balanced at low speed with good results.

The rotors have the following specification:

The LP rotor consists of 5 compressor stages, turns at 9400 RPM and weight is 360 kg (794 pound). First critical speed is 5460 RPM, 2nd is 18400 RPM.

MP/HP rotor consists of 6 compressor stages (3MP / 3HP), turns at 16600 RPM and weigh is 150 kg (331 pound). First critical speed is 6710 RPM, 2nd is 20960 RPM.

My question is, should these rotors be balanced high speed or could low speed also be sufficient (ISO 1940/1 class=G2.5)? And how do I know whether the rotors should be considered flexible or rigid?

Tim

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Both rotors are flexible. This is necessary given the fact that they run above their first critical speed. If they were stiff rotors, the first critical would be above normal running speed. An at-speed balance can greatly reduce the critical response when the machines are started up and shut down. It can also improve performance if you happen upon a rotor stability problem. Since the LP rotor is running at about 50% of second critical, this could be a concern. We now have a policy where we do an at-speed (high speed) balance for all rotors in critical machines that run above first critical. It is very expensive and delays the return of our rotors given the schedule problems getting into the vacuum bunkers for the at-speed balance. But, our vibration levels are much better since we implemented this policy. Our failure rates for seals are much lower. We are getting longer runs between turnarounds. In our case, I feel it is worth the extra cost.

Johnny Pellin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor