Compositepro
Chemical
That is a great quotation.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
At 42 I realized I think like an Engineer, not a Scientist or Writer. 7
- Thread starter KennethUdut
- Start date
- Status
"Unlike the soldier, destruction is not his purpose.", well maybe if you're building targets but in some areas of engineering that sure don't hold true.
Posting guidelines faq731-376 (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
Compositepro
Chemical
Kenat, can you give some examples of what you mean? Designing and building weapons is not an act of destruction. Weapons are tools for good or evil. If that was your point.
Well I was indeed thinking of people working on weapons, specifically close to warheads and the like - the point of the warhead being to destroy something. It was a subtle reference to the old gag about civil engineers making targets etc.
As to weapons being good or bad, same goes for destruction. If you destroy something evil aren't you hence doing good?
Demolition engineers might be another one.
However, way of topic and I'm being kind of an a$$ so I'll leave it at that.
As to weapons being good or bad, same goes for destruction. If you destroy something evil aren't you hence doing good?
Demolition engineers might be another one.
However, way of topic and I'm being kind of an a$$ so I'll leave it at that.
Posting guidelines faq731-376 (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
""Getting things to work using whatever your state of the art is, in the time and resource constraints that you are working within - THAT is what's key""
And math and physics are great facilitators toward this aim.
In the engineering realm there are Technicians and Engineers.
The difference being the amount of theoretical training.
Technicians follow established rule sets for assembling things that work out of the most economical parts in their bin.
Engineers do the same. But they also occasionally establish new rules using applied math and physics and thus make great contributions.
The math and physics sometimes allow the Engineer to see something in the data that doesn't jump out to those will less theoretical training.
So i have to disagree to some extent.
1 A hacker uses limited technician level training to make and modify things by trial and error.
2 The technician knows how the parts fit together so they will work and makes or modifies things by using his extensive knowledge.
3 The engineer knows the math and physics and can create new things never before done by seeing deeper relationships between objects.
Now before the tomatoes start flying I must add.
Hackers can be Engineers,
Engineers can be Technicians,
Technicians can be Hackers or Engineers.
....
Category N can be Category M
The label doesn't make the person.
And math and physics are great facilitators toward this aim.
In the engineering realm there are Technicians and Engineers.
The difference being the amount of theoretical training.
Technicians follow established rule sets for assembling things that work out of the most economical parts in their bin.
Engineers do the same. But they also occasionally establish new rules using applied math and physics and thus make great contributions.
The math and physics sometimes allow the Engineer to see something in the data that doesn't jump out to those will less theoretical training.
So i have to disagree to some extent.
1 A hacker uses limited technician level training to make and modify things by trial and error.
2 The technician knows how the parts fit together so they will work and makes or modifies things by using his extensive knowledge.
3 The engineer knows the math and physics and can create new things never before done by seeing deeper relationships between objects.
Now before the tomatoes start flying I must add.
Hackers can be Engineers,
Engineers can be Technicians,
Technicians can be Hackers or Engineers.
....
Category N can be Category M
The label doesn't make the person.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
