engpes
Mechanical
- Feb 10, 2010
- 175
I have a 60" OD x 2.25" thick vessel with an 18" 600# LWN manway access.
Per the nozzle size above, it is not classified as a "large opening" per UG-36, so I cannot apply appendix 1-7 as a supplement to UG-37.
I am really trying to avoid using an HB LWN nozzle because this will require impact testing to meet my MDMT.
My questions are as follows:
1.) Can I use ASME appendix 1-10 in lieu of UG-37 even though this is not a "large opening"?
2.) Can I use ASME appendix 1-10 in lieu of UG-37 on any size nozzle?
My understanding is that appendix 1-10 is an alternative design method, and does not really relate to UG-37. It is a stress analysis as opposed to an area replacement calculations.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated, as I am in a rush to get this one out. Thanks.
Best regards.
Per the nozzle size above, it is not classified as a "large opening" per UG-36, so I cannot apply appendix 1-7 as a supplement to UG-37.
I am really trying to avoid using an HB LWN nozzle because this will require impact testing to meet my MDMT.
My questions are as follows:
1.) Can I use ASME appendix 1-10 in lieu of UG-37 even though this is not a "large opening"?
2.) Can I use ASME appendix 1-10 in lieu of UG-37 on any size nozzle?
My understanding is that appendix 1-10 is an alternative design method, and does not really relate to UG-37. It is a stress analysis as opposed to an area replacement calculations.
Any assistance is greatly appreciated, as I am in a rush to get this one out. Thanks.
Best regards.