Interesting, but kind of vague. I have the same concerns/questions as CivEnv. My comments follow two quotes.
"The new committee, which now includes two educators and two practitioners, will likely expand."
Steve: I am glad to see that practitioners are equally represented. I feel that with the expansion, ASCE should target to have practitioners in the majority. In my opinion, the breadth of the requirements (quoted below) will be beyond the capabilities of professors - particularly long-term, tenured folks - to fairly evaluate.
"...effort will look at experience in such areas as data analysis, project management, ethics and construction administration."
Steve: Fine, good idea, as long as the mix is appropriately staggered to fit what EITs actually do within their first four years or so. Most EITs in most disciplines likely have ample data analysis (aka, number-crunching). In Site/civil and Env., EITs do very few PM duties, except as assistants. I have no experience with "ethics", outside of school, after 10 years, numerous CEUs and a PE license...how/where does one get that? Which project does one bill for that? Likewise to PM'ing, in Site/civil and Env., EITs do very few CA/CM duties, except as assistants.
Engineering is the practice of the art of science - Steve