Knarf1Man
Civil/Environmental
- Oct 17, 2002
- 7
We recently purchased the 2009 AREMA manual. My questions relate to the use of Table 15-1-15 (Max. Moments, Shears and Pier/Floorbeam Reactions for E80 Live-Load) on page 15-1-77.
To simplify, let's assume that I have a single track that bridges over an unloading pit. There are multiple 12-foot simple-spans that frame into floorbeams, which bear directly on the pit-walls.
My two questions are as follows:
1) For the floorbeams, do I use the listed "Max.Pier Reaction" for a 12-ft span, or do I use the value for a 24-ft span, or do I multiply the 12-ft span value by two (2)?
2) I also see that this table states "All Values are for one-rail (one-half track load)". Does this mean I should size my rail support-members/beams for 100% of the listed values? I know in the past, we have always assumed the tabulated values were NET moments/reactions from an E80 loading that were based off axle-loadings, and thus we always divided the values by two-rails (i.e., 50% of the listed values). Our resulting member sizes were very close/similar to those listed in AREMA Figure 15-8-6 on page 15-8-21.
Any help or clarification on this subject will be greatly appreciated. TIA (Thanks In Advance)
To simplify, let's assume that I have a single track that bridges over an unloading pit. There are multiple 12-foot simple-spans that frame into floorbeams, which bear directly on the pit-walls.
My two questions are as follows:
1) For the floorbeams, do I use the listed "Max.Pier Reaction" for a 12-ft span, or do I use the value for a 24-ft span, or do I multiply the 12-ft span value by two (2)?
2) I also see that this table states "All Values are for one-rail (one-half track load)". Does this mean I should size my rail support-members/beams for 100% of the listed values? I know in the past, we have always assumed the tabulated values were NET moments/reactions from an E80 loading that were based off axle-loadings, and thus we always divided the values by two-rails (i.e., 50% of the listed values). Our resulting member sizes were very close/similar to those listed in AREMA Figure 15-8-6 on page 15-8-21.
Any help or clarification on this subject will be greatly appreciated. TIA (Thanks In Advance)