-
1
- #1
karicow
Structural
- Nov 27, 2017
- 3
I'm a practicing structural engineer and my home state is NC. I've applied for and had no issues with obtaining P.E. licenses by comity in several other states (AL, VA, LA), but have hit a snag with Mississippi. They are denying my application for licensure because they say I have not "fully completed a qualifying NCEES Principles and Practices of Engineering Examination". They state that Mississippi has always required the applicant to pass both the SE1 and the SE2 prior than 2011, or all 16 hours of the current Structural examination. I'm just trying to see if anyone else has run into this issue with MS or any other states. When I spoke to their board representative, he was surprised I have acquired licensure in other states because he doesn't think I've met the exam requirements. In fact, he made it seem like I should never have been licensed at all, having only taken the Structural 1 exam. I took the SE1 exam in 2008, three years before they changed the format to the required two part, 16 hour exam for structural. At that time, if you were in a structural engineering discipline, you could either take the Civil-Structural exam or the Structural 1 exam to be licensed as a P.E. The Structural 1 exam was generally considered the more difficult exam (45% pass rate), and you really only took it if you were going to consider sitting for the Structural 2 exam, which would allow you to be licensed as an S.E. in a few select states (Illinois, Hawaii, etc). I do not recall Mississippi being on that list back then, but they claim they were, and he thinks I will have difficulty obtaining future licenses in other states. They announced the exam change sometime in 2010 I think, and I just wasn't at a good place in my life to prepare for the SE2 before they changed the format. So now, if I want to be licensed as an S.E., I have to start all over and take both parts of the structural exam. Probably not going to happen. When the switch was made to a two part, 16 hour exam, those of us that took the SE1 were supposed to be "grandfathered in" with regard to P.E. licensure, so I just didn't worry about it.
Feeling like not taking the easier way out nine years ago is biting me in the rear, and it's made me nervous that this will keep impacting my career, so I'm just reaching out to see if anybody else has any experience with this. It may just be a quirk with MS. I looked back through website archives of their site, and I sort of think he might be wrong with what their requirements were back then (their archived rules and regulations state nothing about both structural exams begin required). And looking through their old board newsletters, they listed the pass rates and numbers for different exams, and over a several year time span in the mid-2000's, only 1 person even took the structural exam, so there may just be no precedent for this in MS.
Thanks all!
Feeling like not taking the easier way out nine years ago is biting me in the rear, and it's made me nervous that this will keep impacting my career, so I'm just reaching out to see if anybody else has any experience with this. It may just be a quirk with MS. I looked back through website archives of their site, and I sort of think he might be wrong with what their requirements were back then (their archived rules and regulations state nothing about both structural exams begin required). And looking through their old board newsletters, they listed the pass rates and numbers for different exams, and over a several year time span in the mid-2000's, only 1 person even took the structural exam, so there may just be no precedent for this in MS.
Thanks all!