Like all of my postings, my statement of July 18th is only my opinion .... You do not have to agree !!
It would be really, really nice if you answered a few of our questions
Again:
1) What is your Code of Construction ?
2) Does your Construction Contractor offer ANY justification for his sleazy material substitution ?
3) Who benefits financially from the substitution of the inferior, weaker (and cheaper) material ? .... You ? ... or someone else?
4) Will the young newbie field engineer be again blamed when there is a failure during hydrotest ?
.... and, on behalf of LittleInch:
5) What did your Materials Engineer tell you when you asked about the substitution ?
6) Why did you originally have a "Nickel (60%) Chromium, molybedenum, Copper alloy" plate material for this tank ?
Finally "WHAT IS THE TANK'S PURPOSE - WHAT WILL IT CONTAIN ? - WHAT TEMPERATURES AND PRESSURES ????"
Oh, ... and I am deeply sorry if I have hurt the feelings of any grown men with my mean english words ...
Again, this is my opinion only
MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer