Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

AASHTO Rock Socket Side Resistance

Status
Not open for further replies.

jdonville

Geotechnical
Sep 29, 2003
985
The formula given in Article 4.6.5.3.1 of AASHTO HB-17 (page 85) for ultimate side resistance reads as follows:

Qsr = (pi)*Br*Dr*(0.144*qsr)

Yet the label on the y-axis for Figure 4.6.5.3.1A indicates that qsr is the unit side resistance.

Should the formula read:

Qsr = (pi)*Br*Dr*(144*qsr)

to make the units work out?! Or do they intend to reduce Qsr by a factor of 1000 for some reason?!

All responses welcome.

Note: Originally posted in AASHTO Code Forum.

Jeff


Jeffrey T. Donville, PE
TTL Associates, Inc.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I think the equation is correct. qsr is in psi (lb/in^2), but the other units are in kips or feet. So the conversion factor of 0.144 is equal to

(12 in/ft)^2
---------------
1000 lb/kip

The notation and the units for each symbol can be found in Sectino 4.6.2 on page 79.
 
Panars,

Thanks for the explanation. I had not considered that the units of Qsr would be specified.

Jeff


Jeffrey T. Donville, PE
TTL Associates, Inc.
 
jdonville,

I posted the thread "DS Uplift Capacity with Socket". Does the AASHTO HB-17 publication address total side resistance (soil resistance + socket resistance) and the resistance distribution along the shaft? I'm looking at uplift capacity from soil and socket contribution.

Is the publication available on-line?

Jefferys
 
jefferys,

HB-17 is the AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Edition (2002). It is most definitely not free (unfortunately)! Copies are available from AASHTO ( However, Amazon.com and ebay might have 3rd-party (used) copies available. Note that this version will be officially deprecated for highway structure design in a year or two when the LRFD version will be the "official" design basis for federally-funded projects (and likely many state projects, too).

Unfortunately, the document does not give any specific guidance on this topic - which I am pained to admit that I don't know as much about as I should. I am currently looking at DSs with rock sockets for a current project, but they are fortunately short (<15 ft OA) and I will assume negligible contribution from the soil for skin friction.

Off the top of my head, I don't know of any source giving explicit design guidance. But please do let us all know if you find some.

Jeff


Jeffrey T. Donville, PE
TTL Associates, Inc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor