cessna98j
Civil/Environmental
- Jun 12, 2003
- 76
I recently came across the following in the 2005 ACI code:
21.2.5 - Reinforcement in members resisting earthquake-induced forces
Reinforcement resisting earthquake-induced flexural and axial forces in frame members and in structural wall boundary elements shall comply with ASTM A706. ASTM A615 Grades 40 and 60 reinforcement shall be permitted if:
a.) Actual yield strenth based on mill tests does not exceed fy by more than 18,000 psi; and
b.) The ratio of actual tensile strength to the actual yield strength is not less than 1.25
None of my co-workers were really aware of this either, but typically all of our structures are in high seismic areas and it seems that we should be using A706 for everything instead of A615 from here on out.
Does anyone else typically use A706 reinforcing in their special reinforced structures for high seismic areas? Apparently this was even in the 1995 ACI but it definitely doesn't sound like it is commonly known.
Thanks
21.2.5 - Reinforcement in members resisting earthquake-induced forces
Reinforcement resisting earthquake-induced flexural and axial forces in frame members and in structural wall boundary elements shall comply with ASTM A706. ASTM A615 Grades 40 and 60 reinforcement shall be permitted if:
a.) Actual yield strenth based on mill tests does not exceed fy by more than 18,000 psi; and
b.) The ratio of actual tensile strength to the actual yield strength is not less than 1.25
None of my co-workers were really aware of this either, but typically all of our structures are in high seismic areas and it seems that we should be using A706 for everything instead of A615 from here on out.
Does anyone else typically use A706 reinforcing in their special reinforced structures for high seismic areas? Apparently this was even in the 1995 ACI but it definitely doesn't sound like it is commonly known.
Thanks