Anode,
There are many ships at sea with VFD's driving various applications. Some are centrifugal pumps, some are bow thrustors, some are anchor winches, etc.
I would say from experience that you most likely can apply a VFD to the existing motor without having to suffer the additional expense of replacing the motor with a "VFD rated) motor. This is a variable torque application and so, as you reduce the speed, the load drops off as the square of the speed, and the power drops off as the cube of the speed. Ergo, as you reduce the operating speed, the cooling requirements are reduced accordingly.
[If this were an constant torque application; i.e., anchor winch or positive displacement pump, the answer would be different.]
Having done this many times before and not having suffered any known failures, I offer one suggestion; add a dv/dt (du/dt) filter at the output of the VFD. The VFD output connects to the filter input and the motor connects to the filter output. The filter will ensure that the voltage stress on the motor will be minimal. The concern here is that the insulation of the motor windings has aged and is more prone to voltage stress failure syndrome.
Some recommendations are: TCI's KLC filter (
or a Schaffner du/dt filter.
I'd also suggest that your specification for an appropriate VFD include the requirment that the fundamental RMS output voltage not be less than 95% of the fundamental RMS input voltage to the VFD. Some (not all) VFD manufacturers add a wee bit of 3rd harmonic injection and or limited overmodulation techniques to improve the fundamental RMS output voltage. PWM VFDs that do not utilize such techniques, can suffer up to a 15% loss in fundamental RMS output voltage.
Be sure to size the VFD based upon matching the VFD output rating to the motor nameplate amps. Remember, kW (HP) are nominal terms. All VFDs, in fact, all drives are ultimately rated in their output amperage sourcing capability.
Hope this helps.
jOmega